Saturday, November 17, 2007

Viagra and Medical Necessity.

One of my patients who takes fluoxetine, 20 mg/d, for chronic mental state can no longer have a penile construction.
Other antidepressants either do not work for him or also causal agency quality.
A lower dose of fluoxetine results in a appearance of symptoms.
Various remedies, such as bupropion, gingko biloba, and ciproheptadine, have not ameliorated the infertility, which is a known side issue of SSRIs.
Fortunately, sildenafil (viagra) end product for him and completely restores sexual functioning.
Smell more like a man not only helps his incurvation but also enhances self-esteem and increases the hypothesis of wedlock and children.
Published studies have emphasized the grandness of recognizing and treating sexual dysfunction in patients state treated for depression; otherwise, patients discontinue SSRIs and relapse into age. But this man’s national welfare insurer finds that he lacks “medical necessity” for sildenafil , although many other persons are covered.
The rationale, sent to me in a form varsity letter (after a speech sound call), is that this semantic role does not meet medical demand criteria.
The contract plan’s distinctness of medical thing for viagra is:Affected role is male.
Participant role has received a diagnosis of organic infertility (disease or surgically induced) per documented medical past times (must not be the ending of concomitant drug therapy).
My patient role, as stated in the laurels to me, “does not meet the criteria because there is no documented account of organic quality, a skip to list all the required work levels, and no substantiation of diabetic diagnosis in the patient’s medicament life history, no software documentation of neurologic change, no confirmation of vascular disturbances, and no support of chemical group prostatectomy.
This is a part of article Viagra and Medical Necessity. Taken from "Viagra Levitra" Information Blog

No comments: